Experience. Dedication. Results.

Welcome to our Defective Products Blog Series

  • What Everyone Should Know About the FDA's Medical Device Standards

    Innovations in technology have contributed greatly to the development of life-saving medical devices. Not all of these devices are worthy of such praise, however, and it is important for consumers to understand how the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates medical devices. We often hear of lawsuits against the corporations that bring such devices into the market, horror stories of birth ...
    Continue Reading
  • Five Dangerous Toys That Should Stay Off Your Christmas List This Year

    Christmas is almost here. If you have children in your life, you probably experience some joy in making this time of year a memorable one for them. You want to give a gift that makes them smile. What you do not want to do is give them a gift that may potentially harm them. To help make the holidays a little safer, we’ve put together a list of some of the most dangerous toys available this year ...
    Continue Reading
  • What is a Design Defect?

    In product liability cases, there are three types of claims one can make, including the issue of design defects. Unlike manufacturing defects, which are mistakes made in the process of producing a product, a design defect is a flaw in the design that makes the product dangerous even when used as intended. That means, even if the product is consistently made using the best materials, its flaw ...
    Continue Reading
  • How to Know If Your Child's Car Seat Is Defective

    For any parent, the safety of their children is of the utmost importance. This is why it is crucial to make sure that any items bought for the child are not defective and are safe for the child to use. One of the biggest issues parents deal with is defective car seats. This equipment is meant to keep children safely seated in the vehicle and prevent injury in the event of a collision. ...
    Continue Reading
  • What is the Legal Definition of "Failure to Warn?"

    When a product is put on the market, we trust it has been put through rigorous testing to make sure it’s safe. There are very specific regulations that require companies to design and produce safe products. However, if any part of the product is inherently unsafe, it is the duty of the manufacturer to warn consumers of the potential dangers. This is the main focus of product liability cases. When ...
    Continue Reading
  • When Is a Product Considered Defective?

    As consumers, when we go to purchase a product, we expect that it will be safe and work as it is supposed to. Unfortunately, this isn’t always the case – there are plenty of times when a product doesn’t work as advertised or causes a potential danger for the consumer. When this happens, the consumer may suffer a serious injury as a result. If someone is harmed, it may lead to a product liability ...
    Continue Reading
  • John Doe v. Switchgear Manufacturer

    Overview: A 48 year old man suffered third degree burn injuries to his upper body and had his arm amputated after he was electrocuted while at work. He was ordered by his supervisor to place a lead identification tag on an energized cable inside an energized 15,000 volt switchgear, a job which violated OSHA regulations and which other more highly-trained workers had refused to perform. To perform ...
    Continue Reading
  • Matt Love v. API

    Overview: Matt Love was hunting with a tree stand and safety belt in Jefferson County, Missouri. He was harnessed to the tree with a tree stand safety belt. While he hunted, this safety belt was the only thing that connected him to the tree. While using the belt, Mr. Love fell more than 25 feet. He suffered fractured vertebrae, resulting in paralysis . Mr. Love's life care plan indicated projected ...
    Continue Reading
  • Congratulations John G. Simon on being named Best Lawyers® 2015 Product Liability Litigation

    John G. Simon has been named Best Lawyers® 2015 Product Liability Litigation – Plaintiffs “Lawyer of the Year" in St. Louis. He was also selected by his peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America© 2015 in the field of Product Liability Litigation - Plaintiffs. Congratulations John!
    Continue Reading
  • John Doe v. Polaris

    Overview: Plaintiff suffered severe injuries including a compound fracture to his ankle and torn ligaments in his opposite knee as a result of an ATV accident. Plaintiff brought a lawsuit against Polaris in Crawford County, Missouri alleging that the throttle on the ATV was negligently designed so that it was prone to sticking. Plaintiff further alleged that the ETC, which was designed to ...
    Continue Reading
  • Jone v. Coleman

    Overview: A claim was brought against Coleman by the mother of a young man named Cary Lam. Cary went camping with his uncle. They lit a lantern for warmth in the middle of a cool night, and Cary died of carbon monoxide poisoning. The Coleman propane cylinder that was used did not mention the risks of carbon monoxide and stated that the propane should be used in a ventilated area. Both 2' x 2' ...
    Continue Reading
  • Jane Doe v. Polaris

    Overview: Plaintiff suffered injuries when riding an ATV on an asphalt road. Plaintiff filed a lawsuit in Washington County, Missouri alleging that due to negligent manufacture or design of a bolt that kept the rear control arm in place, the bolt snapped , causing Plaintiff to lose control of the ATV. The Plaintiff suffered multiple injuries when the ATV collided with at least two trees. Polaris ...
    Continue Reading
  • Donald Edwards, et al. v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.

    Overview: $2.3 Million settlement for a worker in a products liability suit. A liquid oxygen cylinder fell over and exploded. Attorneys: John G. Simon
    Continue Reading
  • Jason Frede and Alicia Frede v. Ford Motor Company et al.

    Overview: Plaintiffs alleged serious injuries resulting from multiple design features of the Ford Explorer. In addition to the rollover issues often associated with the Explorer, this case involved a claim for Ford's defective design of the vehicle's door latch system. As the vehicle rolled over on the highway, both doors flew open, causing the occupants to be thrown about, held in the car only by ...
    Continue Reading
  • McCarthy v. Cessna Aircraft Co.

    Overview: This case was brought on behalf of the family of a student pilot who was killed in a crash. The suit, which was based on products liability, was settled for a confidential amount. Allan McCarthy was flying a 1977 Cessna single engine aircraft at the time. The family claimed lost wages of between $750,000 and $1M. Attorneys: John G. Simon
    Continue Reading
  • Rodin Hernandez v. Penta Engineering Corporation

    Overview: $1.5 Million Settlement of a products liability suit. A worker was injured when a dust collection system suspended 25 feet above the floor collapsed and struck him. Attorneys: John G. Simon
    Continue Reading
  • Andrew Beavers v. Paradise Valley Residents Association

    Overview: $2.5 million settlement for a 16-year old boy who was paralyzed from the chest down after an automobile accident on an improperly maintained road (no guardrail at a sharp curve). There had been seven prior accidents at the site. Attorneys: John G. Simon
    Continue Reading
  • Michael Lebrun v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.

    Overview: $6.5 million settlement of a product liability suit. The plaintiff was a fire fighter who suffered brain damage when the oxygen alarm on his oxygen tank malfunctioned while he fought a fire in a high-rise retirement center. This suit resulted in a national recall of the product. Attorneys: John G. Simon
    Continue Reading
  • Drug Manufacturers Responsible For Man's Illness

    A jury recently returned a verdict of $104 million to a man who was diagnosed with Hepatitis C after a clinic was found to have reused syringes to administer anesthetic. The man sued Teva Parenteral Medicines, which manufactured the drug, and Baxter Healthcare Corporation, which distributed the drug. The jury faulted the two companies for their involvement with the extra large vials that were ...
    Continue Reading
  • "Stryker Hip Lawsuit News: The Simon Law Firm, P.C., notes recent $4 billion settlement of DePuy hip implant cases

    PRESS RELEASE The Simon Law Firm represents patients who have been injured by metal-on-metal hip implants manufactured by Stryker Corporation. These cases are currently pending in the U.S. District Court of Minnesota, MDL No. 13-2441, wherein the Court issued its fifth pre-trial order on November 5, 2013 regarding the organizational structure for plaintiffs and defendants. Significantly, in a ...
    Continue Reading
  • Jury Finds Johnson & Johnson's Warnings Labels Inadequate For Motrin

    A jury recently awarded a verdict of $48.2 million to a young man who suffered serious injuries after taking Motrin to alleviate a fever and body aches. He sued Johnson & Johnson, among others, alleging that the warnings regarding reddening of the skin, rashes, and blisters were insufficient. He claimed that the companies knew or should have known that ibuprofen is associated with risk of Stevens ...
    Continue Reading
  • The Estate of Cliff E. Cruse v. Johnson & Johnson Corporation et al.

    Overview: Thirty-five year old Cliff Cruse was found dead by his minor son near midnight on April 12, 2006. The toxicology report revealed a lethal concentration of fentanyl in his blood. At the time of his death, Cliff was wearing one 75 mg/hr Duragesic fentanyl patch manufactured, distributed and sold by Defendants. Duragesic is a 72 hour transdermal pain medication that is absorbed through the ...
    Continue Reading
  • Jury Finds Toyquest Banzai Falls In-Ground Pool Slide Dangerous and Defective

    A jury recently returned a $20.64 million verdict to a man whose wife died of injuries suffered while using a Toyquest Banzai Falls In-Ground Pool Slide. The wife's family sued Toys "R" Us, alleging that the slide was not properly designed and was not adequately tested. The woman slid head-first down this inflatable slide at a pool party. The slide deflated toward the bottom so that the wife ...
    Continue Reading
  • Mattel fined $23 Million for toy hazard

    MSNBC reports that in a settlement with the Consumer Products Safety Commission, Mattel Inc. and it's subsidiary, Fisher-Price, have agreed to pay a $2.3 million civil fine for importing and selling toys with excessive levels of lead. In 2007, Mattel was among dozens of manufacturers who yanked their toys off the shelves when excessive amounts of lead were found in the paint. Lead produces bright ...
    Continue Reading
  • US peanut butter recall includes 101 products

    CBS News reports an ongoing recall of peanut and almond butter products due to possible salmonella contamination. New Mexico-based Sunland Inc.'s recall now includes 101 products, and several retailers have issued additional recalls including items made with Sunland ingredients. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says there are now 30 illnesses in 19 states that can be traced to ...
    Continue Reading
Page 1 of 2

Let Us Review Your Case

Fill out the form below for a free, no-obligation evaluation of your case. Our attorneys are ready to provide the representation you need. Please note that until we have entered into a written representation agreement with you, no attorney-client relationship is established. We will nonetheless keep all information you send us confidential.

  • Please enter your name.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
Why Choose The Simon Law Firm, P.C.
  • Our mission is to provide the highest-quality legal services with integrity, professionalism, and respect for our clients.

  • We handle our cases on a contingency fee basis, so you don't pay unless we recover for your case.

  • Since the firm was founded in 2000, we have obtained more than $1 billion in verdicts and settlements.

  • We have been named one of the "winningest firms" in the U.S. by The National Law Journal.